The bonds between master and servant are also looser in democracies than in aristocracies. The relations between servant and master are very different in a democracy than in an aristocracy because the only difference between them is based on a temporary and freely made contract. Chapter 5: How Democracy Modifies the Relations Between Master and Servant Equality also makes Americans see that they are all weak and subject to similar dangers, so they tend to lend mutual help when needed. Chapter 4: Consequences Deriving From the Three Preceding Chaptersīecause they sympathize with the sufferings of their fellows, Americans are quick to give assistance. In foreign countries, however, Americans are highly sensitive to criticism because of the high opinion they have of themselves and their country. Chapter 3: Why the Americans Are So Hard to Offend in Their Own Country and So Easily Offended in OursĪs a result of equality, Americans treat one anther with a great degree of mutual tolerance and are not easily offended. ![]() ![]() Chapter 2: How Democracy Leads to Ease and Simplicity in the Ordinary Relations Between Americansīecause there are no prejudices or class barriers to prevent people from socializing with one another in a democracy, people relate to each easily in a natural, frank and open manner. ![]() In times of equality, people are more sensitive to the sufferings of others because they can imagine themselves in the same position. foreign policy.Buy Study Guide Volume II, Part III: Influence of Democracy on Mores Properly So Called Chapter 1: How Mores Become More Gentle as Social Conditions Become More Equal 3 To further inoculate us from unsafe thoughts, Congress passed a totalitarian-type law in 2003 creating an advisory board that can censor any course curriculum at publicly funded institutions that contains “ anti-American ” criticisms of U.S. gov- ernment approval, which is not easy to do. ” In 2004, regulations were is- sued barring American publishers from printing books by authors from nations that are under U.S. passports and put on “ No Fly Watch Lists ” because the State Department decided that their activities were “ contrary to the interests of the United States. government signed the Helsinki accords, an agreement among nations not to impose travel restrictions upon their own citizens. Meanwhile right-wingers and reactionaries from other countries generally enjoy unchallenged entry. States must file their fingerprints with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, make “ pro-American ” vows, and provide proof that they are now actively engaged in opposing communism. Canadian communists who want to visit the United 119 Under a 1990 law, supposedly no one can be refused a visa because of ide- ology, yet the State Department and ICE continue to maintain a “ lookout list ” of hundreds of thousands of persons, many of them connected to peace and social justice organizations. 2 So the government protects us from dangerous thoughts by deciding whom and what we can or cannot hear from abroad. ” Every year under these sweeping provisos, scores of internationally prominent wri- ters, artists, musicians, scientists, and labor leaders from other countries have been refused the right to visit and address audiences in the United States. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) exclude anyone from abroad who might be affiliated with communist, anarchist, or allegedly “ terrorist ” groups, or who engage in activities “ prejudicial to the public interest. ![]() The Communist Party had its assets seized and was illegally de- nied tax exemption for years - while the two procapitalist major political parties enjoyed uninterrupted exemption. THE REPRESSION OF DISSENT One agency used by the authorities for political harassment is the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), which has gone after civil rights leaders and anticapi- talist radicals. The law often appears ineffective when attempting to implement social reforms that benefit the many, but when mobi- lized against political heterodoxy, law enforcement is pursued with a boundless punitive vigor that itself becomes lawless. C H A P T E R 10 Political Repression and National Insecurity The corporate-dominated state is more sincerely dedicated to fighting organized dissent than fighting organized crime.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |